Property of a Lady: a creepy but flawed ghost story

Property of a Lady by Sarah Rayne

 

TYPE OF SUSPENSE: Supernatural

WARNINGS:

One sex scene; one instance of black magic that went into WAY too much detail for this Christian reader.

If you’re still with me, read on…

I am constantly in search of the perfect suspense read–especially a good old-fashioned ghost story. I realize the definition of “perfect” when it comes to a book is a very subjective thing, but for me, I love books that are creepy/spooky, atmospheric, spine-tingling. They’re full of mystery that grows out of good characterization and an intriguing premise, and they manage to surprise me. The very best will leave me thinking, maybe even still puzzling over a detail or two.

For the first two thirds of Property of a Lady, I was hopeful that this was going to be one of the best ones. Definitely creepy and atmospheric, it actually managed to give me a fright once or twice. And the intrepid main characters who were looking into all this weirdness were great fun, especially the Oxford professor with the mischievous cat.

Then came the last third of the book and…I just don’t know what happened. Was the author rushed? She wasn’t sure to do with all that creepiness and convoluted back story she was putting together?

Because here’s what happened, for me at least. It went from spooky and mysterious with sensible characters to…well, sort of silly, with characters doing things that made no logical sense at all.

I am going to attempt to describe some of these problemms without lapsing into spoilers.

First, having one person—in particular, a professional who has been called to the creepy old house to investigate paranormal activity—write down every scary thing that’s happening as it’s unfolding around them makes sense. A professional investigator would want a log of events as they happen. But having every other person from the past do the same thing started to make me roll my eyes. I mean, seriously, if you were down in your basement and heard someone coming, probably to murder you, would you sit at your desk and write down that someone was coming down the stairs to murder you? When this happened, by this point I thought to myself, I bet the murderer continues the story. Sure enough, the murderer picked up the pen and wrote about what he had just done in the murdered man’s journal!

Then there was the woman who woke up with a strange man standing over her bed. She screamed. Her husband came running in and accused her of having invited the man into her bedroom for immoral reasons. With the potential rapist/murderer/criminal still in the room, the husband and wife proceeded to argue about her fidelity and his lack of prowess in bed. Totally ignoring the intruder, who was still standing there. Umm…don’t you deal with the intruder first and argue later?

I could give other instances, but I think you get the point. I’ve read other reviews of this book and I don’t think these things bothered other people. One of my colleagues loved this book, but said she almost felt it was satire or parody. So if you like a nice creepy ghost story and don’t require it to be entirely logical—or go at it with tongue planted firmly in cheek—you’ll probably still enjoy Property of a Lady. 

Share

Next Gen Harry Potter Readers: How Will the Movies Affect Their Experience?

The reading experience of next generation Harry Potter readers

I just finished up auditing a graduate-level Harry Potter course called Taking Harry Seriously from the Mythgard Institute, a part of the new Signum University. The professor was the amazing Dr. Amy Sturgis–I simply can’t praise her enough! If you love Harry Potter, fantasy or gothic literature, try to at least audit one of her classes.  Imagine taking a course with people who love the same kind of literature you do, and getting to discuss it in a serious, in-depth way from a brilliant professor who loves the subject as much as you do!

One week, Dr. Sturgis asked us for our thoughts on how the Harry Potter movies would affect the reading experience of the next generation of Harry Potter readers.  The first generation of Harry Potter readers read the books first. They imagined the characters and the places for themselves. But many, if not most, of the next generation of readers will either see the movies first or at least run across clips and photos to the extent that it will be very difficult to come to the books with a completely fresh perspective. I shared my thoughts with Dr. Sturgis on this topic–and thought I would now share with you, you lucky dog! Here’s my letter:

Hi, Professor.

In the last lecture, you asked for our thoughts on next generation Harry Potter readers, whether they will come to the movies before the books, and how that might affect their experience.

Seeing the Movies First

 

This is a very interesting topic to me. Naturally, I’m viewing it through the lens of my own experience. Over the years, I’ve actually preferred to see movies first, then read the books. First, because it was too jarring to form my own mental images of characters and then see totally different people onscreen. Even if they were brilliant actors and did a wonderful job, they didn’t look the same. And I sometimes have trouble forming mental pictures of places from book descriptions, so having the movie scenery in my mind can help.
Second, you almost always get less in a movie–less detail, less plot and character development, etc. I preferred to get a taste from a film and, if I liked it, dive into the book and get more. Finding new scenes and extra detail in the books would be such a delight! Coming from the other direction–book to movie–was almost always a letdown. Invariably, the scene or character I’d be anticipating would be cut altogether. Or twisted in some disappointing way. So I definitely preferred movie first, then book if I liked the movie.

Other classic movies/books

 

And of course, during my childhood, there were other huge films based on books that almost everyone saw either as a movie first, or only as a movie. The Wizard of Oz and Gone With the Wind are the two that come to mind. I read both of those books because I had seen the movies and loved them so much. I found reading Gone with the Wind to be a treasure, because the book was like the film in spirit, but there was so much MORE.
The Wizard of Oz…I loved the book, but it was so different from the film that in a way it was a totally different experience. Almost…a book that I enjoyed and a movie that I loved but no real connection between the two.
However, when I came to the Potter books (very late, in 2008) and started reading them, I didn’t want to see any of the movies until I finished reading the books. For some reason, I felt those books were special, and I wanted to approach them fresh and unaffected, as other readers and friends had.

The Harry Potter movies and the books

Of course, even I, a Potter virgin, had seen movie trailers. So I think I had a sort of Daniel Radcliffe-ish picture of Harry in my head. And an Alan Rickman picture of Snape. Maybe that partly explains why these book-to-movie experiences were some of the least jarring I’ve ever had. Or maybe Rowling was that good at description. But when I saw the movies, Hogwarts, Privet Drive, the characters were almost all very close to what I had pictured.

All of this is a lengthy way of saying, I think a huge percentage of new readers will see the movies first. And many movie-goers will never read the books. (Most of the people I know who saw The Wizard of Oz and Gone With the Wind didn’t go on to read the books.) Those people will be cheating themselves out of something wonderful, but they wouldn’t have read the books, anyway.

But there will be others who see the movies, love them the way I loved The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind and wanted more. And they’ll be delighted with the extra…the secrets, the humor, the detail and richness of the Wizarding World…the undercurrents! And yes, they’ll be picturing Alan Rickman and probably Daniel Radcliffe and the Hogwarts of the movies, but as you mentioned in the lecture, I think Rowling’s vision was realized so closely that that’s not necessarily a horrible thing.

Will the movies look dated?

 

Also, you asked whether the movies will become dated and people will think they look silly–and therefore will avoid the books. I think story and character trump everything. Back to referencing The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind–they’re still brilliant. I have recently seen The Wizard of Oz terrify children who have seen the best that modern movie-making and special effects can throw at them.
And then there’s a British science fiction show called Blake’s 7. The special effects were pretty laughable to begin with and are most certainly dated and silly now, but the story-telling and characters are so compelling that it fires the imagination–or at least it does mine–nonetheless.
So…that’s my take on all this movies vs. books business. What about you?
About Robin:

While waiting for her writing to pay off, Robin Johns Grant had some fairly boring jobs but also did a lot of crazy fan stuff, especially in Harry Potter and Star Wars fandoms, which helped her dream up her first novel Summer’s Winter. According to John Granger, author of several books on Harry Potter, “Robin Johns Grant’s Summer’s Winter is the most inventive take on fan fiction I can imagine — because it’s a romance-thriller about fandoms, especially if not explicitly the Harry Potter fandom, and explores the important intersection of literature, spirituality, and imagination. Delightful!”
With a degree in English and a mid-life crisis coming on, Robin returned to school and earned a master’s degree in library and information science a few years ago. She now has her best day job ever as a college librarian, which keeps her young by allowing her to hang out with students. 

Share